"89.11% of the respondents expressed concern about the theft caused by insecure door locks." On May 10, 2017, "China Household Door Lock Usage Survey Report" was released, and the respondents were most concerned about the "security anti-theft" and comparison. The contrast created by low security has caused widespread concern. The low security is not only the feelings of the consumers, but also the safety hazards caused by the locks have also stumbled on the two giants in the security door field - Buyang and Panpan.
Nearly 90% of respondents are worried about the safety of door locks
Rotate the key and lock the security door. If you have obsessive-compulsive disorder, you may confirm it again, but is it safe?
On May 10th, Sina Hui, editor-in-chief of Sina Home Furnishing, released the “Investigation Report on the Use of Chinese Family Door Locksâ€, which is the first barrier against the family – the survey on the use of door locks from 33 provinces across the country. The 8367 valid questionnaires surveyed by the city and the autonomous region unveiled the consumer's inner fear of the security of the door locks and knocked on the door lock industry.
According to the survey, only 10.89% of respondents said they never worried about theft due to insecure door locks. 63.74% of respondents occasionally worried that 25.37% of respondents would often worry about this. 88.71% of respondents who live in the community enjoying property services are still worried about this issue. Faced with this surprising data, Meng Hui lamented: "So it seems that the current door lock does not bring a full sense of security to Chinese families."
The anti-theft door is also called the anti-theft security door. It refers to the "door with anti-theft lock, which can resist abnormal opening under certain conditions for a certain period of time, has certain safety protection performance and meets the corresponding anti-theft security level." The door lock is the key to the security of the security door. The security door must be equipped with an anti-theft lock. The security door cannot be easily opened except for the matching key, but this is obviously not the case.
Concerns about the security of the door lock directly affect the purchase behavior. Some real and interesting data appeared in the investigation report. In the “Safety Status of Chinese Family Door Locks†section, the most concerned about the purchase of door locks by respondents is “security and securityâ€. The ratio is as high as 86.67%; “lower security†and “not convenient†are the two major problems that respondents think traditional gates are locked in. Respondents believe that the biggest problem with traditional mechanical door latching is “lower securityâ€. The proportion of 50.49%, the second problem is "not convenient", accounting for 35.45%; 73.82% of respondents hope not to bring the key.
The safety of locks has been stumbling
If the consumer's concern about the security of the security door is only a psychological feeling in the research report, then in the CCTV "Weekly Quality Report" security door quality survey on February 19, 2017, the Tianjin Consumer Association specifically targeted the market. The comparison test results of the mainstream brand A-class security door organization really shattered people's illusions about the security of the security door lock: Step by step 2 minutes and 44 seconds, Pan Pan 6 minutes, the security door giants The lock is tripped safely.
The national standard "General Technical Conditions for Anti-theft Security Doors" stipulates that Class A security doors must be equipped with Class B locks, and the anti-destruction time of the lock parts must be more than 30 minutes. Tianjin Consumers Association purchased 16-inch Class A security door from the large-scale home improvement building materials market and security door store, and sent it to the Ministry of Public Security's Safety and Police Electronic Product Quality Testing Center for testing. It was found that the door lock site was protected against damage. Nine of the samples did not meet the standard requirements, and the non-compliance ratio was 56%.
Among them, the damages of the sample locks named Longyu, Shenjiang, Nengcheng and Rishang's security doors are 21 minutes, 20 minutes, 24 minutes and 11 minutes respectively, which is not less than the 30 minutes required by the standard. The nominal damage of the sample locks of the Maxim, Feiyun, Longyang and Panpan brand doors is only a single digit, which is 4 minutes, 5 minutes, 5 minutes and 6 minutes respectively; and the tester is in the nominal The level-follow-type step-yang security door sample locks only 2 minutes and 44 seconds, which is the worst performing sample on this project.
"Like the sample of the stepping security door, the destruction test of the lock part only took 2 minutes and 44 seconds. The sample of the security door of Maxim, which is nearly 4,000 dollars, is the most expensive one, but its lock The detection of the part (destruction) took only 4 minutes, and the gap from our standard requirement of 30 minutes was very large." Chen Yunkui, director of the Consumer Guidance Supervision Department of Tianjin Consumer Association, believes that such a security door sample does not meet consumer expectations. Quality and requirements.
Smart door locks try to solve security problems
There is also an interesting data in the "Investigation Report on the Use of Chinese Family Door Locks". The anxiety about the security of security doors has also eased the face of smart door locks, although respondents are most concerned about smart doors when purchasing. The problem of locks is still "safe", but the proportion has dropped from 86.61% in the face of mechanical locks to 50.49%; the second concern is "can quickly identify unlocks", accounting for 16.99%; ranking third concern The question is "whether the operation is convenient", accounting for 12.93%.
Is the smart door lock really better than the mechanical lock in terms of safety?
A security expert pointed out that in some communities that still use old-fashioned mechanical anti-theft locks, burglary has occurred. The fundamental reason is that mechanical anti-theft locks are always behind in the race against theft and unlocking technology. Electronic locks are used as locks. Products with higher industry safety factors are superior to traditional mechanical locks in terms of technical protection, performance safety and operational intelligence.
On May 10, at the launching ceremony of Huitai Longyun Lock White Paper and the launching ceremony of Huitai Longyun Lock Research Institute, Huilong Chairman Chen Hong filled in the passion to demonstrate the safety of new products. “Fingerprint identification using biometric fingerprint sensor The fourth generation of fingerprint readers, anti-copying, password anti-peep system, can not obtain passwords through other technical means, such as preventing monitors, etc., which has aroused the interest of people from all walks of life.
“With the upgrade of consumption, home safety is an important entry point. I hope to work with Huitailong to create a safer, more comfortable and beautiful living environment for users.†Many people in the field are the same as Wang Xionghui, CEO of Shenzhen Ou Ruibo Electronics Co., Ltd. Behind the security, I saw the door lock as a big opportunity for the smart home entrance market.
Editor in charge: null